Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Orfield Visit Follow Up: Interesting Housing Links.

For those who attended one of three Orfield presentations, I found several items of potential interest after the session I attended in Clackamas on Tuesday morning.
  1. The housing arm of the Minneapolis Metropolitan Council is the Metro Housing and Redevelopment Authority (MHRA). Their website is HERE.
  2. MHRA directly administers both Public Housing and Section 8 vouchers. More than 6,600 units (which may include LIHTC and project based Section 8) are funded or administered by MHRA.
  3. In their HUD required 5 year plan HERE (MS Word) you will see that MHRA recently received HUD approval to convert their small 150 public housing unit program to project based Section 8 housing assistance and their voucher administration includes 283 project based section 8 vouchers.
  4. A draft July 2009 report (A Comprehensive Strategy to Integrate Twin Cities Schools and Neighborhoods) from Orfield provides the same kinds of analysis for the Minneapolis region as was presented in the Portland Metro analysis, and a LOT more. Beginning towards bottom of page 27 of that analysis HERE, affordable housing programs (including LIHTC, project based section 8, and HUD vouchers) are examined AND changes in the distribution of that supply are used to illustrate how affordable housing might make a MAJOR contribution to solving the problems of African American racial segregation. Some of the report findings:
In 2004, there were 17,109 Section 8 vouchers used for housing in the Twin Cities. The vouchers contributed to residential segregation because, as Map 13 shows, they were used disproportionately in the central cities and stressed suburbs. The central cities contained less than 23 percent of the region’s population but they had 47 percent of the metro’s Section 8 vouchers.
....Fifty-eight percent of black households used their vouchers in the central cities while only 46 percent of all the Section 8 voucher users were located in the central cities.
LIHTC ...units are disproportionately located in Minneapolis neighborhoods, where the share of minority and low-income residents are already high. The map also highlights the concentration of LIHTC units within Minneapolis in “qualified census tracts,” demonstrating how the program’s incentives to locate units in these tracts contributes to residential segregation within Minneapolis as well.
IF anyone has additional thoughts/follow up from the three sessions held in Portland, I invite you to post them as comments below so all interested can get a better feel for discussions held in all of the sessions.

Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.

2 comments:

  1. Hi Tom, sent you an e-mail regarding this post then realized how to actually create a post. Anyway, I am suggestion that, per the Housing Land Advocates comments to Metro on Oct. 15 on their UGR, that Metro adopt a comprehensive affordable housing, land use and transportation policy. This will eliminate the silo effect we see when measuring transit decisions by the performance measure of whether they move large numbers of people from point a to point b. A good starting point for a discussion on what such a policy will look like will be on November 9 when there will be a free webaire to discuss how this type of policy will be fleshed out on the federal level. Here is the registration info:

    E. Johnson

    TO THE ATTENTION OF DIVISION ADMINISTRATORS and DIVISION PLANNING and ENVIRONMENTAL STAFF:



    The purpose of this message is to inform you of the upcoming webcast on the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Interagency Partnership for Sustainable Communities. This webcast is sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration, in cooperation with the Center for Transportation and the Environment (CTE) at North Carolina State University. The webcast will include a panel discussion on the DOT, HUD, EPA Interagency Partnership for Sustainable Communities. Below is the logistical information:


    Topic: Webcast on the Interagency Partnership for Sustainable Communities

    Date: Monday, November 9, 2009

    Time: 12:00 PM to 2:00 PM Eastern



    The webcast will provide an overview of the DOT, HUD, and EPA Partnership for Sustainable Communities and highlight its current efforts. Aimed principally at management and planning staff of state DOTs, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), and transit agencies, the webcast also will be of interest to environmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, universities, and private-sector organizations.



    Panelists for the webcast will be:

    · Derek Douglas –Special Assistant to the President for Urban Affairs

    · Beth Osborne – Deputy Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy U.S. Department of Transportation

    · Shelley Poticha – Senior Advisor for Sustainable Housing and Communities U.S. Housing and Urban Development

    · John Frece – Director – The Smart Growth Program – U.S. Environmental Protection Agency



    There is no fee to view the webcast, and we encourage participants to register at http://cte.ncsu.edu/cte/TechTransfer/Teleconferences/index.asp at least 24 hours prior to the start of the session. The CTE will also be sending out an announcement with registration information. If you have any questions regarding this webcast, please contact Shana Baker in the FHWA Office of Planning at Shana.Baker@dot.gov or (202) 366-4649. Although they will be receiving separate invitations, please feel free to also share this information with your State DOT, MPOs, and others who might be interested.



    ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­_____________________________

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Tom, I have a map created by the Housing Authority of Portland in May 2009.It maps the change in the number of Section 8 leased up vouchers, by zip code, over the past 10 years. Will locate and send so you can post. It is a stark demonstration of the lack of affordable housing opportunities for low-income households with housing assistance. There is a major shift of voucher holders out of West and the inner S.E., N.E and N. Portland into the far outer Eastern Portland and into Gresham. For most of the increase in E. Portland and Gresham, the amount of change is over 100%. Clearly demonstrates Orfield's analysis that poverty is being concentrated within certain geographical areas.

    E. Johnson

    ReplyDelete